Boise State
Boise State University · 2023 · Mountain West
Boise State went 8-6 and was ranked 49th in the FanBoardHQ CFP Rankings (blended resume and efficiency). Their 29th-ranked offense was the engine, backed by a 52nd-ranked defense. They ran the ball on 55% of offensive plays with a 7th-ranked rushing attack and passed the ball on the remaining 45% of plays with a 35th-ranked passing attack.
Quadrant record
By opponent strength, adjusted for where the game was played.
Projected wins
Per-game win probabilities combined across the full schedule.
The resume
Every game on the schedule. Click a row for the game breakdown (played) or the matchup projection (upcoming).
| Wk | Opponent | Conf | Opp rank | Result | Exp. margin | Win prob | GameScore | Quad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Washington | Pac-12 | #1 | L 19–56 | -17.6 | 0% | -2.8 | Q1 |
| 2 | vs UCF | Big 12 | #56 | L 16–18 | +2.1 | 0% | 3.9 | Q2 |
| 3 | vs North Dakota | MVFC | — | W 42–18 | +19.1 | 100% | 6.4 | Q4 |
| 4 | @ San Diego State | Mountain West | #108 | W 34–31 | +14.3 | 100% | -4.6 | Q4 |
| 5 | @ Memphis | American Athletic | #36 | L 32–35 | +0.2 | 0% | 1.9 | Q2 |
| 6 | vs San José State | Mountain West | #67 | W 35–27 | +7.8 | 100% | 6.5 | Q3 |
| 7 | @ Colorado State | Mountain West | #97 | L 30–31 | +13.3 | 0% | -5.5 | Q4 |
| 9 | vs Wyoming | Mountain West | #42 | W 32–7 | +9.6 | 100% | 23.8 | Q4 |
| 10 | @ Fresno State | Mountain West | #57 | L 30–37 | +5.5 | 0% | -3.4 | Q3 |
| 11 | vs New Mexico | Mountain West | #115 | W 42–14 | +24.0 | 100% | 12.1 | Q4 |
| 12 | @ Utah State | Mountain West | #94 | W 45–10 | +13.4 | 100% | 22.4 | Q4 |
| 13 | vs Air Force | Mountain West | #45 | W 27–19 | +5.8 | 100% | 9.7 | Q3 |
| 14 | @ UNLV | Mountain West | #50 | W 44–20 | +1.7 | 100% | 27.2 | Q2 |
| Postseason | ||||||||
| — | vs UCLA | Pac-12 | #34 | L 22–35 | -3.8 | 0% | -2.1 | Q2 |
14 played · 8-6. Expected margin and gamescore use the latest ratings — a completed game shows what the model would say now, not that week.
The season
The model’s read on Boise State, recomputed after every week. Toggle between overall, offensive, and defensive efficiency (each with a dot for that week’s game) or the FanBoardHQ CFP rank.
Passing & rushing
Opponent-adjusted, FBS-only. The bar is the blended Eff rank — EPA/play (scoring value), success rate (staying on schedule), and yards/play (explosiveness), each standardized against the FBS field. The three ranks below each bar are those components, so you can see what's driving it.
Their offense vs. what their defense allows.
Scored vs. allowed, all regular-season games.
What kind of team is this?
Every team by offensive and defensive efficiency (points/game vs. an average team, higher is better on both). Click a dot for that team.
Field position 77th · Finishing 24th
Field position 23rd · Finishing 66th
2.71 points per drive on offense, 2.02 allowed — starting, on average, at their own 30.
Play-calling & efficiency
What the offense did, by quarter and by down — raw, not opponent-adjusted.
| Quarter (att.) | Pass / rush | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1(209) | 46% / 54% | 48% | 6.3 |
| Q2(259) | 42% / 58% | 49% | 8.1 |
| Q3(208) | 46% / 54% | 46% | 6.6 |
| Q4(230) | 36% / 64% | 43% | 5.8 |
| Down (att.) | Avg. to go | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st(151) | 10.2 | 40% | 7.9 |
| 2nd(112) | 8.8 | 43% | 8.4 |
| 3rd(116) | 7.7 | 42% | 7.4 |
| 4th(3) | 7.0 | 100% | 11.0 |
| All (383) | — | 42% | 8.0 |
| Down (att.) | Avg. to go | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st(259) | 9.7 | 50% | 6.3 |
| 2nd(193) | 6.7 | 46% | 5.2 |
| 3rd(63) | 5.0 | 60% | 6.2 |
| 4th(8) | 2.5 | 75% | 5.1 |
| All (523) | — | 50% | 5.9 |
Boise State, all games.